Kaif represents the new face of Indian cricket
© Reuters It is important that the performance of the Indian team in their ICC Champions Trophy opening game against Zimbabwe be viewed with sympathy
Partab Ramchand
16-Sep-2002
© Reuters |
Zimbabwe have almost always been tough opposition for India. In the
head-to-head record, India are way ahead but what this simple fact
will not convey is the numerous occasions on which the Indians have
had to sweat it out before securing victory. In sub-continental
conditions, the Indians' superiority is much more marked and in normal
circumstances, India should have won with some deal of comfort. But
against the background I have already described, the narrow margin of
victory perhaps was not surprising.
The batting did not exactly cover itself with glory. If the recovery
was strong - 87 for five to a final total of 288 for six - questions
might well be asked as to why there was a crisis in the first place.
Some complacency, a few faulty shot selections and yes, a bit of
staleness were evident.
One may be tempted to say all is well that ends well. But there is
little doubt that the famed Indian batting will have to perform up to
reputation in the game against England. It is not a healthy
development if there are to be retrieving partnerships for the sixth
and seventh wickets every time.
Rahul Dravid is perhaps enjoying the finest phase in his outstanding
career. He is right now at a stage when little is going wrong for him.
His timing and shot selection is impeccable and it matters little
whether he is playing in the West Indies, England or Sri Lanka or
whether it is Test cricket or the limited overs game.
© CricInfo |
Unfortunately, the bowling problems remain, whether it is Test cricket
or the shorter version. While the four main bowlers more or less did
their job creditably, the problem lies with the ten overs to be sent
down by non-regular bowlers. In 12 overs on Saturday, Tendulkar,
Ganguly and Yuvraj gave away 78 runs. With the team management firmly
bent on playing seven batsmen, there is tremendous pressure on the
four bowlers to come good and if any of them fail, the back-up
strength just does not inspire confidence.
But there is no need for the Indians to press any panic buttons even
if they are in the proverbial group of death. The victory over
Zimbabwe does not guarantee the runners-up of the 2000 tournament a
place in the semifinals. A crucial match against England remains to be
played.
Perhaps VVS Laxman can replace Dinesh Mongia and Ajit Agarkar can take
Ashish Nehra's place. That could strengthen the team even if it does
not solve the problem of the lack of a fifth main bowler. But with the
policy of playing seven batsmen firmly in place, there is very little
that can be done in this regard except to hope that the main bowlers
are niggardly and that the remaining ten overs are not very expensive.
The Indians have a few days to work out the necessary tactics and
there is no doubt that the team members will welcome the rest and
relaxation. Somehow one senses the players will rise to the occasion
against England.