Mid-life crises - 1996
The sudden departure of Sidhu- the most senior member of the touringparty, having made his Test debut in 1983 - put a big question markover the vital opening slot
Partab Ramchand
10-Sep-2002
The morale of neither England nor India could have been particularly
high on the eve of the 1996 three-match Test series. While India's
home record was awesome, their record abroad was nothing to boast
about. England too, with a series of setbacks both at home and
abroadm, could not have been very confident. Predictably enough, then,
the series was marked by much mediocre cricket with just a few
highlights.
The sudden departure of Sidhuthe most senior member of the touring party, having made his Test debut in 1983 - put a big question mark over the vital opening slot. In his absence, various pairs - Vikram Rathour and Ajay Jadeja in the first Test, Rathour and Nayan Mongia in the second, and Mongia and Sanjay Manjrekar for the third - were tried out, but none came good. |
Opinion on this incident was sharply divided. Given Sidhu's soft and
studious nature, it was believed that he would not have taken the
extreme step unless he had a very valid reason. The other school of
thought was that whatever the provocation, Sidhu should have stayed
behind, for after all he was representing the country and should not
have allowed personal misunderstandings to cloud his decision.
The sudden departure of Sidhuthe most senior member of the touring
party, having made his Test debut in 1983 - put a big question mark
over the vital opening slot. In his absence, various pairs - Vikram
Rathour and Ajay Jadeja in the first Test, Rathour and Nayan Mongia in
the second, and Mongia and Sanjay Manjrekar for the third - were tried
out, but none came good. Under the circumstances, the Indian batting
was always under pressure, and full credit must be given to Sachin
Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid for rising to the occasion
in the second and third Tests after the first at Birmingham had been
lost by eight wickets.
Ganguly's batting in fact was the major highlight of the series. There
was an outburst of criticism over his selection, but taking this in
his stride, the stylish left-hander from Bengal let his bat do the
talking. He made his debut in the second Test at Lord's in storybook
fashion, becoming the first Indian to hit a century in his first Test
at cricket's historic headquarters. Overall, he was the 10th Indian to
perform the feat.
Going in at number three, Ganguly faced 301 balls for his 131, hitting
20 fours. For good measure, he got 136 in the next Test at Nottingham,
figuring in a record third-wicket partnership of 255 with Tendulkar
(177). This time Ganguly showed his penchant for big hitting, clouting
two sixes and 17 fours. He also became only the third batsman to hit
centuries in his first two Test innings, after Lawrence Rowe and Alvin
Kallicharran. By the end of the series, the man whose selection had
prompted howls of protest headed both the Test and tour averages. In
the Tests he finished with 315 runs at an average of 105.00, while in
the first-class matches, he amassed 762 runs at an average of 95.25.
As if all this were not enough, he also headed the bowling averages
with six wickets at 20.83 apiece. The legend of the Prince of Calcutta
was born.
Dravid was not far behind. By contrast, his selection had been widely
welcomed. He started off with 95 on his Test debut at Lord's and
followed it up with 84 at Nottingham, and it was obvious that India
had discovered two young batsmen who were, in racing parlance, stayers
rather than sprinters. Events over the last six years have only served
to confirm this view. Dravid finished third in the Test averages with
187 runs at 62.33, while in first-class games, he aggregated 553 runs
at an average of 50.27.
Tendulkar lived up to his reputation. He made a masterly 122 in a
losing cause at Birmingham. This was one of the finest knocks of his
career, for he struck 19 fours and a six over 177 balls, while no
other batsman even got to 20; Manjrekar's 18 was the next-best score.
Coming in at 17 for two after India faced a first-innings deficit of
99, Tendulkar was ninth out at 208.
The effort was in vain as England went on register the only victory of
the series. He followed this up with his second century of the series
at Nottingham. Tendulkar, who was named among Wisden's cricketers of
the year, scored 428 runs in the series at an average of 85.60 to
finish second to Ganguly in the averages. He was second to Ganguly in
the tour figures too (707 runs at 64.27).
The batting of Ganguly, Dravid and Tendulkar helped cover up the
wretched form of Azharuddin, who scored just 42 runs in five innings
at an average of 8.40. Little went right for him as far as batting and
leadership were concerned, and at the end of the tour, Tendulkar
replaced him as captain. Manjrekar too failed, getting just 105 runs
at 26.25, although he did fairly well in the first-class games scoring
540 runs at an average of 41.53. Rathour was another batsman who
scored heavily on the tour (805 runs at 47.35), but he came a cropper
in the Tests, being reduced to 46 runs at 11.50.
Like the batting, the bowling too presented problems. Too much
depended on opening bowlers Javagal Srinath and Venkatesh Prasad, and
to their credit both shouldered the heavy responsibilities admirably.
Srinath took 11 wickets at an average of 39.36, while Prasad, who made
his Test debut at Birmingham, was the bowler of the series, taking 15
wickets at only 25 apiece. He also headed the tour figures with 25
wickets at 29.36 each.
India's leading spin bowler Anil Kumble was a sore disappointment, his
five wickets costing him 66.80 apiece - the first indication that
Kumble overseas was not the master bowler he was at home. On the tour
he did little better, as his figures of 13 wickets at 56.84 will
readily testify. The support from Paras Mambhrey, Venkatapathy Raju,
Narendra Hirwani and Sunil Joshi was painfully inadequate.
England for their part were quite happy at emerging narrow victors in
the series. Batting was their forte, as exemplified by totals of 313,
344 and 564 in successive Tests. Nasser Hussain got two hundreds,
skipper Michael Atherton and wicket-keeper Jack Russell hit one each,
while Graham Thorpe was a picture of consistency. Seam bowling was
their trump card, and Chris Lewis (15 wickets at 23.73), Alan Mullally
(12 at 24.83) and Dominic Cork (10 at 36.90) did their job in
exemplary fashion. England also won the three-match one-day series
2-0. Even in the tour results, the Indians did not have a record to
write home about. Out of 11 first-class games, the tourists lost two
and drew nine.