Sudha Shah: Our batting really let us down
There are several reasons why a team can lose a World Cup
Anand Vasu
21-Dec-2000
There are several reasons why a team can lose a World Cup. Not playing up
to potential in a key game, under pressure, is one that is the most common.
Anyone who watched the semifinal of the CricInfo Women's World Cup 2000
between India and New Zealand will testify that this was exactly what
transpired. The Indian team seemed almost overawed by the occasion and
slumped to a nine wicket loss and were knocked out of the tournament.
Speaking to this correspondent over the telephone from Lincoln, New
Zealand, the Indian team's cricketing manager Sudha Shah shed some light on
what went wrong.
"Basically batting was our strength throughout the tournament.
Chanderakantha Kaul and Anjum Chopra were in good nick, and had scored over
500 runs between them before the semifinal. In the semifinal however,
things went wrong for us. Both Chander (Chanderakantha Kaul) and Anjum
(Anjum Chopra) were dismissed without scoring and this made a big
difference," said Sudha. Chanderakantha top edged a delivery from Kathryn
Ramel and was easily caught in the eleventh over. Three balls later, Chopra
played all around a straight, full delivery from Ramel and India were in
trouble at 26/3. "Of our top five batsmen, three did not contribute to the
total. This was a big blow. Our batting really let us down," she continued.
Sudha added that India's start was not a bad one, "Both Smitha Harikrishna
and Purnima Rau approached the task sensibly. Although they were not
scoring too quickly, they gave us a good start. Unfortunately, Smitha
Harikrishna was brilliantly caught." With wickets falling quickly, Rau
could not play out the task set out for her. "Purnima Rau is an experienced
campaigner and she handled the situation well. Although she was sent in
with an idea of exploiting the fielding restrictions, she was forced to
curb her strokes. With wickets falling so quickly, she had no choice but to
play the role of sheet anchor," said Sudha.
Another thing that hampered the Indians was the absence of Mithali Raj. In
the three matches that she played, Mithali notched up scores of 69 not out,
51, 32, at an average of over 75. Raj could not play any further part in
the tournament and was hospitalised with a chronic infection. "Mithali
Raj's presence would have made a huge difference in the big match against
New Zealand," said Sudha. She was quick to add, "It was not just the fact
that she made good scores. You should have seen the ease with which she was
making runs. Even against England, though she made only 32, she was in such
fine form. But I'm not making excuses. Even without her we should have done
much better."
When asked whether the team went into the match feeling sufficiently
confident, Sudha replied, "We have played New Zealand before and knew that
the game would be a tough one. However, we have been preparing for this
game for a long time now and were very confident going into the game. We
had a gameplan, tried a few innovations, but things just didn't go our
way." That can be said again. Planning is one thing, execution something
quite different. Although India did cut a bit of a sorry figure, as one
enthusiast quipped, "It was a bit disappointing, but nothing more
experience won't fix!"