Boasting can't improve performance
Karachi: Wasim Akram's big boast was exposed to ridicule at Brisbane when Pakistan was roundly beaten by ten wickets after scoring 648 runs in both innings
Sohail Kidwai
13-Nov-1999
Karachi: Wasim Akram's big boast was exposed to ridicule at Brisbane
when Pakistan was roundly beaten by ten wickets after scoring 648 runs
in both innings. Cricket is ofcourse by chance, as the maxim goes, but
not as much as our losing team made it look in the first Test against
Australia.
Let us examine and assess our mistakes instead of trying to mask them
with inane excuses like lack of practice, Saqlain Mushtaq's unfitness
or Mushtaq Ahmad's absence of touch. Ironically when the latter was
in full cry during the world cup matches he was not played even once
by thesame skipper and yet Pakistan reached upto the final.
The way our openers were selected for the Brisbane Test betrayed
partiality and even dishonesty. Muhammad Wasim, a middle order
batsman, was entrusted with the responsibility of an opener, a
manifestly wrong strategy. There were two regular openers available
besides Saeed Anwar namely Wajahatullah Wasti and Ghulam Ali who has
come in after a five year lapse mainly because he happens to be the
Captain's PIA pal.
One does not know why these two were included in the squad when the
skipper had no intention to give them a chance. As regards Muhammad
Wasim let me remind the fans that he was played in a one day match in
Pindi at the expense of Youhana which was a costly decision. I think
on a strip like Brisbane a batsman was only liable to get out because
of a palpable mistake on his part.
A bowler has little say in the matter. On such a pitch a defensive
field is set not an attacking one and the captain's instruction to the
bowler is to bowl according to field. Thus either a batsman will pay
for hismistake or at least the scoring rate will be hampered.
Here the Aussies were allowed a free rein and our stock bowlers Azhar
Mahmood and Abdur Razzak were wayward in line and length.
These two allrounders had a successful run in one day games. The
reason is obvious. There is a world of difference between one day game
and Test matches. In the shorter tightly time-bound frame the batsman
has to attempt a scoring shot even on an outgoing ball while in the
conventional format one has to be selective and cautious. Consequently
different strategies need to be adopted.
Today Mr Pybus poses as a PHD in cricket whereas his assigned
responsibility, to improve the fielding, went openly by default. The
way catches were missed, particularly by Mohammed Wasim, will be
ruefully remembered. The fact is that Pybus is entrusted wih a
responsibility for which his credentials are far from being
authentic. His opinion on batting, bowling and keeping is hardly of
any consequence. He is merely a trainer.Wasim Akram should not barter
our international cricket prestige for his personal friendship in this
case or for that matter in persisting with Ejaz at this stage.
The basic difference between our batsmen and those of Australia was
one of attitude. They stood their ground, applied and concentrated,
showed mental toughness and above all single-minded
devotion. Countries which had willow-wielders of this ilk and calibre
like our own little master Hanif, Sunil Gavaskar of India, Geoff
Boycott of England and Desmond Hayens of West Indies, were made of the
stuff that wins Test Matches. Our batsmen - at least some of them -
should take a cue from old masters.
Even if they look upto Saeed Anwar as a role model as he was in
Brisbane they will do better. By the way Saeed could handle Shane
Warne easily because he is a left hander and by saying so I do not
want to take away any credit that rightly belongs to him. A little
more patience and tenaciousness will bear fruitful result. If Wasim
Akram takes Wasti as Saeed's opening partner and brings in Saqlain,
resting Mushtaq for a while, the team's performance can be
considerably improved.
In conclusion my advice to Wasim Akram - a world class cricketer among
whose admirers I count myself too - is to refrain from making
long-winded remarks after losing a match. His world cup harangue
sounded as if his script was swapped with Steve Waugh's. As an
experienced professional he should leave speech - making to his so-far
mum manager and concentrate on cricket and ask the boys to do the
same. We do not lack talent, only Test temparament is wanting, which
the captain should inculcate. He should remember that deeds speak
louder than words