What Happened in 1999? (18 June 1999)
What Happened in 1999
18-Jun-1999
18 June 1999
What Happened in 1999?
Malsiri Kurukulasuriya
In the past days and weeks, Sri Lankans have indulged in one of their
favourite pastimes: That of criticising others. The venom was
directed at our cricket team. Much of it personal, while others
covered the full gamut from the CEO to the physiotherapist.
Let me avoid this trap and try to establish, Where and Why we went
wrong. The responsibility must begin with the National Selectors and
to a lesser extent the Tour Selectors. I could not understand the
selection of Hathurasinghe. He is past his best and any number of
young players could have replaced him as an all - rounder. One must
also question the exclusion of Ruchira Perera, who displayed promise
on the Australian tour. With Sanath's form and fitness in question,
Aviska Gunawardene or Russel Arnold should have been included.
The selectors on tour started the rot by leaving Mahela Jayawardena
out of first game. They then sent Tilekeratne in at No. 4, Why? The
early order batsmen were struggling and the situation was exacerbated
by constant changes in the batting order. One had to feel for
Mahanama. He did his job where ever he batted.
With Sanath struggling, Why was he not dropped to the No. 6 spot
where he could have batted with the soothing effect of the skipper at
the other end. That was a very poor and costly mistake. There were
enough guys who could have opened, - Atapattu, Mahanama, and
Kaluwitharana.
The fielding showed a marginal improvement. We did field like in the
old days in the South African game. But we were not consistent. And
it showed.
In 1996 Sri Lanka revolutionized the one-day game with an all out
attack in the first 15 overs; that was not the appropriate tactic
under English conditions. The other teams played continuously till
the ball was old enough to play attacking cricket. They accelerated
the paced in the last 15 overs. But Sri Lanka went the old route on
the promise that what was good enough then, was good enough now. The
loss of form by Sanath and Aravinda at the same time was too great a
set back for a struggling team to overcome.
We now have to review the position of the Coach. Our record since Roy
Dias took over can only be described charitably as poor. But in his
defence one must remember that he had to deal with coaches, of
slowbowling, fast-bowling, and fielding! This meant a dilution of his
authority: and no coach can function effectively in such an
atmosphere.
We are always confronted with the question of whether the coach be
local or foreign. The disadvantage of the local coach is that he
could be subjected to unhealthy pressure from friends and relatives
of players, some of whom could be powerful persons and capable of
exerting adverse pressure on the coach. The other consideration is
that the local coach could come with pre-conceived ideas about some
of the players which could eventually lead to confrontations.
This could have deleterious effect on the whole team. Such conditions
led to Javed Miandad's departure as coach of the Pakistan team, just
a short time prior to the World Cup.
For these reasons, I would lean towards having an experienced foreign
coach to guide us through the painful re-structuring that has to
happen with the least possible delay.
One damaging statistic is that while all teams that participated in
the 1996 World Cup had 5 to 6 new faces, Sri Lanka had only 2. This
means that our cricket development programs are not working or the
selectors are wearing blinkers. I suspect that it is a combination of
both.
We have to take a close look at our current programs to see what is
wrong. Although the Board pays lip service to developing cricket in
the provinces, I can't see what they have done. I can speak of Kandy
and its environs. Nothing of permanent value has been established.
The under 17 and under 19 tams are the most important squads, since
it is here that the future national players are groomed. By the age
of 19 or even earlier, all the basics must be in place. After that it
is difficult to make corrections. We have to establish Cricket
Academies in Kandy and another in Galle to supplement the one in
Colombo. (These should take precedents over a stadium in Dambulla).
There is absolutely no doubt about the availability of talent. The
question is what are we doing to harness this talent? As Napoleon
once said "Talent without opportunity is a waste".
There is no need to panic. The older players should think of retiring
and put something back to the game by taking up coaching. Sri Lanka
is lucky when compared to Pakistan and West Indies. In Pakistan there
is no organised school cricket and in the West Indies there are 4 or
5 private schools that play cricket. The development of cricket is
entirely done by the clubs. Yet they have produced so many great
cricketers.
So, let's stop moaning and get on with the job of restoring our
cricket to the standards commensurate with the abundant talent
available.
We now have to deal with the all important question of captaincy.
Arjuna has already declared his intention to carry on. I am
disappointed because he has now put the ball in the selectors court.
Sooner than later they have to find a new captain. For a man who has
done so much for cricket in Sri Lanka, He has put himself in a
position when he will be relieved of his captaincy. Would it not be
more dignified if he makes himself the decision? Should be dropped
from the captain's role I hope he will not want to play regardless of
who gets his job. To have Arjuna in the team, is going to make things
very difficult for the new captain.
Who will inherit the Ranatunga's mantle? I see three possible
candidates: Mahanama, Sanath, and Mahela. I would not go to Mahela
for fear of his catching the "Tendulkar Virus". He has lots of time.
Between Mahanama and Sanath, I prefer Roshan. Why? First and foremost
he still a very good fielder. This is vital, because unless he is,
how could he chastise a team-mate for sloppy fielding. I also have
seen him captain the Sri Lanka team in Sarjah a few years back.
He handled his bowlers well, and was outstanding in the field. The
only question is whether he is good enough to make the side on his
own merits. I say yes, He has been up and down the batting order. Yet
he has never complained and always has given his best. The World Cup
showed us that, whoever it is, I hope the selectors will make the
move now.
I feel the Board of Control should make an effort to get some of our
promising youngsters an opportunity to play a season or two abroad,
particularly in England and Australia. We have terrific supporters in
both countries and they will do whatever needed to assist the Board
in this important venture. All the members of the Test playing
counties have 3 or 4 players who have had overseas expereince. A good
example is Zimbabwe. Paul Strang, Andy Whittal, Neil Johnson, Heath
Streak, Andy Flower, John Robinson have played first class cricket
overseas. The strides the team has made in the past 12 months is
nothing short of phenomenal. And this is attributable to the
expereince gained by the players named above.
It is hoped by all Sri Lankans that the Board will settle its own
internal problems amicably and promptly, so that they can come to
grip with the important task of getting our cricket back on track.
Source :: The Daily News