Colin Croft's Prescription for English and West Indian Cricket (6 June 1999)
Steven Camacho, the Chief Executive Officer of the West Indies Cricket Board, is very open, honest, communicative and informative when it comes to something rather close to his heart; the perils, fortunes, future and hopes of West Indian cricket
06-Jun-1999
6 June 1999
Colin Croft's Prescription for English and West Indian Cricket
Colin Croft
"Very Radical Ways To Effect Changes in West Indies and English
Cricketing Prospects for the Future"
Steven Camacho, the Chief Executive Officer of the West Indies Cricket
Board, is very open, honest, communicative and informative when it
comes to something rather close to his heart; the perils, fortunes,
future and hopes of West Indian cricket.
I spoke to Steven Camacho in a telephone interview last Thursday (June
03). He easily cleared up any misunderstandings about the presence of
Manager Clive Lloyd, Coach Malcolm Marshall and Acting Coach Sir Viv
Richards in the managerial structure of West Indies cricket.
This was necessary as it had been rumoured among the press in the
United Kingdom that Clive Lloyd would elect to stand down after the
absolutely dismal showing of the West Indies cricket team in the World
Cup. Remember too that Sir Viv took over for the ailing Marshall in
the West Indies team effort.
Said Camacho; "As far as I know, Clive's and Malcolm's contracts do
not expire until October next. At that time, supposing that both are
still in their respective positions, and I see no reason why that
should not be so, the WICB would then make decisions about their
future in the WICB's structure. I have not heard anything officially
of Clive's wanting to step down. That is just a rumour. As is well
known, Malcolm has had a serious medical problem and he will have to
have some considerable time convalescing before he, and indeed the
WICB, could make a decision on his effectiveness for the future."
Camacho continued; "The West Indies are due to go to Sharjah from
October 13-22 next. It is more than likely that, barring any
additional health problems, both Clive and Malcolm will be the manager
and coach of that short tour. Please note that Viv was only a
stand-in for Malcolm until the World Cup ended. By the time the
Sharjah 1999 tournament is completed, a decision will have been made,
or, at least, will be close to being made."
Asked if Sir Viv will be better suited to continue now in that
coaching role, as he had already started in the position, Camacho
replied; "That too will be decided in October. Things right now are
as they were before Malcolm's illness. We welcomed Viv's input, but
the WICB does not foresee making any decisions until October."
I have nothing but respect for Clive Lloyd and for Malcolm Marshall as
players and captain, but I genuinely believe that both should be
relieved of their positions immediately, if not sooner. Why prolong
this continuing agony any longer? Not even masochists enjoy and
appreciate such pain.
I said as much after the Debacle of South Africa and, despite a slight
respite against Australia in the Caribbean, nothing that has happened
since to the West Indies cricket team has convinced me otherwise.
The team's overall performance has become worse, if anything, despite
Brian Lara's brilliance against Australia.
I have nothing against these two erstwhile performers in their day.
The facts are simple. Lloyd and Marshall have managed to have overseen
too many debacles recently; Pakistan 3-0 (3 Tests series), South
Africa 5-0 (5 Test series) and 6-1 (ODI) and now the World Cup effort,
which was a total disgrace. This has got to stop somewhere certainly
sometime. Now is as good as any.
The West Indies managed to draw against Australia on the backs of
Brian Lara, Courtney Walsh, Curtly Ambrose, Jimmy Adams and Ridley
Jacobs, so please do not tell me there was a turn-around. Indeed, had
Lara not made his 546 runs, the result against Australia would have
come uncomfortably close to the tour of South Africa, as the other
batsmen produced just as little against Australia as they had against
South Africa. Check the final statistics and you would see that I am
right. Combine any three of the other West Indian batmen in that
Australian series and you will find that their combined aggregate does
not even match Lara's 546. The West Indies' World Cup embarrassment
confirms that there is much too much rhetoric but little substance to
follow from this team. Talking a good game makes no sense. Making the
correct changes and effecting the correct attitude will. Here is an
example.
The practice sessions at Leicester for the game against Scotland were
so very intense and serious, I was particularly impressed and pleased
and I even mentioned that to Lara in the press conference after that
game. It should be noted that the West Indies blasted Scotland out
for 68 in only 31.1 overs, then, knowing then that a good run rate was
needed, the blazed the required runs in just over 10 overs.
In the meantime, the last practice sessions at Old Trafford for the
all-important game against Australia was a joke. Unlike the Scotland
game, where the intensity was evident, there were so many unnecessary
people IN the nets at Old Trafford. Everyone in the West Indies
cricket team seemed so relaxed and confident. The resulting 110 blew
that thought open.
Obviously, Australia had not read the script. Australia easily
disembowelled that West Indian confidence.
Here is another scenario which should have been attended to properly.
For both the game in Dublin against Bangladesh and the game at
Southampton against New Zealand, the West Indies had great
opportunities to pump up their run rates. This may just have seen
them survive to the latter stages of the competition.
Instead, the West Indies just dallied along. After having Bangladesh
at 55-4, Bangladesh still managed 182 in a lengthy 49.2 overs. It
took the West Indies all of 46.3 overs to get the required 183. That
was scoring at 3.95 runs per over. Worse was to come. The West
Indies got the better of the toss against New Zealand. At one stage,
New Zealand were 59-5, yet they too rallied to get to 156 in an also
lengthy 48.1 overs. In effect, with conditions as good as any
throughout the series for batting, since the sun actually came out and
the pitch had dried out, the West Indies took longer to overhaul New
Zealand, runs per over, than it took for them to beat Bangladesh.
They batted at an even more pedestrian 3.57 runs per over to overhaul
New Zealand's 156, taking 44.2 overs.
This obvious lack of planning, leadership, awareness and foresight
must not be allowed to progress any further. It seems that everyone
at these games were aware as to what the West Indies should have done
except the West Indies themselves.
Lloyd is quoted in a recent news agency story as saying that "the
present West Indies cricket team is not far off from being a good
decent cricket team." I wonder which team he has been looking at.
For one to address a players in a team as "decent", then that team
must have players, period!! This utterance, if true, even
overshadows his previously, openly given opinion, made during that
tour of South Africa, that "Stuart Williams, our opening batsman, is
one innings away from being a great player."
Hopefully, Williams will remain that innings away from being a great
player. He is probably the poorest equipped batsman to have played
for the West Indies in the recent years. If you doubt me, check the
stats. He averages in the low 20's in Test and just over 30 in ODI's.
Worse, he certainly did not look the part in the World Cup, yet
someone somewhere persists with him. This crappy rhetoric must stop!!
I am here to tell the West Indies manager and all who now want to
listen, those who lived in fantasy land over the last few years or so
while I continued to say the same things I am now saying again, and
perhaps now being accepted by even the greatest sceptics and believers
in West Indies cricket, that the West Indies cricket team has very few
players of real international class. There are probably now only
three, maybe four players of real determination, class, poise and
ability to operate at international levels and standards, as low as
those international levels and standards are these days. Of course,
the soon-to-finish ageless wonders, Curtly Ambrose and Courtney Walsh
will not be counted here.
Brian Lara, Ridley Jacobs, Jimmy Adams and Shiv Chanderpaul are
probably that four. Only two, Lara and Chanderpaul, are really gifted
enough, and young enough, to carry West Indies a long way. Jacobs is
good, but he will not last forever. Adams is barely good enough. In
reality, that is indeed it.
The others, with the possible exception again of Reon King and Merve
Dillon, to use a boxing term, are simply journeymen, but they must
not be confused with the master electricians of the same name. Many
may not like that term, but that is the truth.There is nothing
masterful about this lot. Because they continue to hear it from their
manager and coach that they are good enough, certain players in the
West Indies cricket team will believe it. That is just not good
enough. Incidentally, Ricardo Powell should be given another chance
to restart, but in Test cricket this time.
Unfortunately for West Indies cricket, it is my opinion that Clive
Lloyd has become more like the present West Indies cricket team;
morose, careful and even less friendly than the normal West Indies
teams normally are; than the team should have become like him when he
was captain; enterprising, relaxed, professional, sometimes even
playful, but certainly successful. Even if the team were not
successful, at least they should look as if 100% effort is being given
at all times.
I believe that Viv Richards should be appointed immediately, if not
sooner, as "Supremo", Manager/Coach all in one, to partner Brian
Lara. If for no other reason, Viv has no agenda as he is already very
great and knighted even. He has no plan but to win. He respects all
but fears none.
These two and only these two must be responsible for the actual
selection of the West Indies cricket team. A few scouts could be used
to ear-mark a few players for extra observation and implementation.
The Manager and Captain must also be responsible for anything less
that 100% effort. That is something they must insist on. Even if the
results are not immediately forthcoming, the effort must be total.
West Indies cricket must not be allowed to continue waddle into the
21st century like it has been this two years!!
Unfortunately for England, their situation is extremely similar to
that of the West Indies, though at least for the West Indies, there is
already an incumbent captain.
Even more than the West Indies, England should have a complete house
cleaning, wipe their slate completely clean. Indeed, it may even be
better for them to have a new slate, period. Both the West Indies
and the English teams are too surrounded by personnel who talk a good
game, but do nothing to change their team's status.
If you doubt me, mark these words here. Whenever you listen to David
Lloyd doing commentary, now that he is not the Coach of England
anymore, he will pinpoint exactly, and absolutely correctly, what is
known to be needed to help England. The only problem when he was
actually Coach was that David Lloyd would not have been brave enough
to actually do the needed changes in his tenure. He had too many
masters to please. It should also be noted Cheerleaders do not
normally play the actual game!!
From top to bottom, including the present Manager and all players,
England should clean house. Then, from the very few worthy players
around they would have left, a captain should be selected. A very
important necessity would be that the actually elected captain must be
worth his place before being considered, much less elected, as
captain.
England must get rid of that attitude, disease even, of not wanting to
lose, something ingrained in anyone over 40 years old and involved in
England's cricket. They must be adventurous to win. Being
adventurous sometimes means losing. For example, what the England
cricket fraternity did to Alex Tudor in Australia after his
aggressive, better than average start, was scandalous. Potentially
good players must be encouraged and, like race horses, let go, given
their head, so to speak, to run.
I am very convinced that England's problem over the recent years is
the result of their supposedly "good" County Cricket. Firstly, while
it is changing somewhat, players, especially those with average and
below average ability, still consider playing for their counties more
important than playing for their country. That is somewhat
understandable, in a sense. After all, the counties provide daily
bread and butter. Playing for the country does provide icing on the
cake, but it is not guaranteed. How, though, could anyone feel that
playing cricket at county level could be more important than playing
at test level, the highest level of cricket, is beyond comprehension.
County cricket allows some real fantacising. Frankly, it is rather
poor. Counties accept players who just get by. Most of the batsmen
would manage 1000 + runs even if they were average. This is from 17
games. A bowler may have in excess of 70 wickets in that 17 games
too. It does not take a special effort to do that.
Can you imagine India's Sachin Tendulkar losing sleep at any time when
he knows that Ian Austin, Mark Ealham, Adam Hollioake and Andy
Flintoff will be attacking him the next morning? Sachin will probably
oversleep!!
Look at Phil Simmons for Leicestershire. He is a world-beater when
playing there. He is useless as an international cricketer when
playing for the West Indies, more cheer-leader than player. That does
not work in the real world!!
The truth is, these guys are average in the big leagues, at best.
Yet, these guys are stars at their respective clubs.
Final example here. Look at Lancashire's poor batting performances
when Flintoff, Austin and Neil Fairbrother are absent. If that does
not tell the true story of the mediocrity of county cricket, then
nothing can.
England, like the West Indies, has two "real" bowlers, Alan Mullally
and Darren Gough. Make them the nucleus of a good bowling attack,
then look for young upstarts like Tudor to do their thing.
England's batting, more or less, is the same. Nasser Hussein and
Graeme Thorpe are really the only batsmen close to world class in the
present England team. Make them the nucleus of the batting. Expand
the footprint a bit and go down to Wales and such places for batsmen
who are prepared to throw the bat around.
Another fact, one many would not want to accept as true, since so many
are now being "employed" as so-called coaches, is that there are just
too many coaches around. There is just too much overall coaching
around these days.
Throw in a few youngsters and see how they swim in the big leagues
with the real whales. Believe me, if they are good enough, they will
survive. Strangely, that was the modus operandi when the West Indies
started putting together that winning combination in the late
seventies which ruled the world until the start of the nineties. If
it worked then, I am sure that it will work now.
In addition, Nasser Hussein should be the captain of England. He
demands and commands great respect from friend, foe and all others.
He is worth the respect given to him. He is a good player,
inspirational, a tremendous fighter and something of a class act in
every way. He may not have done much with the captaincy for Essex
yet, give him the opportunity to really shine through as a leader,
then see what happens. He might just surprise a few people
positively.
Alex Stewart should be put out to pasture like the rest. He has done
fairly well, but his presence does not give any real confidence to his
players and even the people who appoint him. Some of his decisions are
strange, at least. Alan Mullally, in my opinion far and away the best
bowler in England's team when the team was in Australia, never opened
the bowling once there in the last Ashes series. Had he done so,
England may even have beaten Australia.
There are two things about the Coaching position, in England and in
the West Indies, that I would love to see. Firstly, the cricket team
Coach should be soccer-like. He must be allowed to make unilateral
decisions and be held responsible for them, win or lose. No hiding
behind anyone. He must also have a free hand, in collusion with his
Captain only, to select whom he thinks would make a good combination.
Secondly, in especially England's case, there is no-one absolutely
English around, except perhaps Ian Botham and Tony Greig, who really
knows about winning and more particularly, the enterprise necessary
for winning. England is in a quandary. Almost everyone over 40 years
old is too steeped in the negative attitude of useless rhetoric,
satisfying too many masters and, especially, not having ever been
involved as a real winner at the highest level of the game. On the
other hand, none of the "new" breed happen to have the winning
experiences neither, nor especially the know how needed to be
aggressive and win.
Therefore, the English cricket Coach should be a foreigner who has no
other agendas other than winning. It has not been so bad for soccer.
Indeed, English soccer especially has benefited tremendously from the
foreign invasion of Managers, who do, more or less, the same job of
cricket team Coaches.
Manchester United has benefited immensely from the presence of Alex
Ferguson, a Scotsman. Arsenal must be smiling all the way to the bank,
and elsewhere, because of the input of Frenchman Arsine Venga.
Dutchman Ruud Gullit is now trying to work his managerial magic again
at Newcastle after making Chelsea winners again. It is not just
incidental that Manchester United, Arsenal, Newcastle and Chelsea have
dominated English soccer over the last five years. They have won
almost everything. Surely, their managers had something to do with
it. Need I say more.
There is a reason for this. These managers take no prisoners. They
also ask no quarter. These guys brought enterprise and a winning
attitude with them. Winning is all that matters to them, not
molly-cuddling those tremendous egos of the players and almost
everyone else.
For English cricket to progress, the cricketing authorities must take
chances. I may even have a few serious suggestions for the position.
If England could afford them, then maybe Tony Greig could be
consulted, along with Ian Botham. Greg or especially his still
extremely fiery brother Ian Chappell would be absolutely suited for
the position, even if it might be sacrilegious to have an Australian
as the coach of England at cricket. If he is not otherwise taken up,
Pakistan's present captain, Wasim Akram, could also be a good
possibility, if he chose to stop playing in the almost immediate
future. If the West Indies does not need Sir Viv, he too could be
consulted. Australia's immediately past captain, Mark Taylor,
perhaps another sacrilegious suggestion, is not a bad bet neither.
These guys were not "day in, day out" cricketers in their day, such a
most of the recent coaches of England, of which David Lloyd was the
latest, have been. Those named were winners. Those previously named
know how to win, made a habit of winning regularly and know how to
create winning combinations and teams. What has any of the so-called
knowledgeable, recent coaches of England won, either in their playing
days or while in coaching/management. In a word, nothing!!
If England, and indeed the West Indies, do not want to bite the bullet
now, then the 21st century could be even more painful that the
experiences of the latter part of the 20th century. It will be good
for Test cricket the world over if both the West Indies and England
could put out creditable teams, even if they do not win everything.
At least, cricket will be the eventual winner.
Source :: Colin Croft