Chappell: McGrath has the batsmen in his spell (29 November 1998)
ENGLAND were saved by rain after succumbing to leg-spin in Brisbane and they capitulated to pace on the first day of the second Test at the WACA
29-Nov-1998
29 November 1998
Chappell: McGrath has the batsmen in his spell
By Ian Chappell
ENGLAND were saved by rain after succumbing to leg-spin in
Brisbane and they capitulated to pace on the first day of the
second Test at the WACA. The batsmen are now at such a low ebb
mentally it would not seem to matter which bowlers the Australian
selectors pick as long as they retain Glenn McGrath as the
spearhead.
On a day when McGrath tightened the noose around Mike Atherton's
neck by dismissing him for the 12th time in 17 innings, he also
had a firm grip on a few other England batsmen's throats. As a
bowler, McGrath does not do anything exceptional with the ball,
like swing it or seam it a long way, but his attack is relentless
in its pinpoint accuracy and every delivery is part of a plan.
At the WACA, he simply bowled an impeccable line and length,
hammering away around off-stump and the capitulation followed as
batsman after batsman hung their bat limply and presented easy
offerings to the keeper and slip cordon.
McGrath enjoyed solid support from Damien Fleming, who was
preferred to Michael Kasprowicz as the into-the-wind swing bowler
and gleefully seized his opportunity, and the rehabilitated Jason
Gillespie.
The easterly breeze in Perth always provides assistance for the
swing bowlers and Fleming capitalised by producing a beauty to
get rid of Mark Butcher. Following McGrath's example, Fleming
bowled off-stump and consistently made the ball swing out to the
right-handers. The right-handers obligingly kept nicking the ball
and not only did Fleming finish with his first five-wicket haul
in Tests, but Ian Healy also claimed five victims. For England,
it was a case of more nicks than a bad day shaving.
From the moment Mark Taylor won the toss and inserted England,
the Australians were on top and the danger now is that the
tourists are psychologically scarred to the point where they
cannot come back. Most of these England players are now so
familiar with losing to Australia that they cannot imagine being
the dominant team in an Ashes contest.
Graeme Hick and John Crawley are classic examples. Both came and
went in quick time and in familiar fashion and to make matters
worse, Hick dropped a sitter from Taylor - as if the Australia
captain had not had enough good news for one day.
Hick and Crawley fell to the bouncy Gillespie, who displayed
enough pace in his few overs to believe that the work done on his
back and his action has been worth the pain of missing nearly two
years' Test cricket.
Virtually only three bowlers were required to demolish England as
they completely failed to capitalise on what I thought was a poor
Australian selection. In recent times, Australia have won despite
some mystifying selections and the inclusion of Colin Miller here
should have been looked upon by England's batsmen as a bonus. The
selectors had 50 cents each way as Miller is neither the best
swing bowler nor the best spinner in the country, but bowls a bit
of each. Australia's fourth bowler should either have been
Kasprowicz if they wanted an all-pace attack or if they believed
a spinner was required then Stuart MacGill was the man.
The panel rationalised their confusing selections with a
ridiculous "horses for courses" explanation but as long as
McGrath continues to bombard the top order, it will look like a
plausible theory. I can only say that the selectors are fortunate
the race is on the flat and England are not putting any hurdles
in Australia's way.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)