12 December 1998
Deflated Waugh has time for regret
By Mark Nicholas
ALL EYES were on Mark Waugh at the Adelaide Oval yesterday,
though not for long because his tortured innings came to a tame
and merciful end courtesy of his old Essex mate Peter Such after
just 36 painful minutes.
For the record he made two singles, a two and a three. He faced
26 balls from which he did not score and might have been out to
any number of them. Darren Gough bowled fast, aggressively and
very well at him; Such gave him nothing and bowled no less well.
In the end it all became too much for Waugh and he danced down
the wicket to drive into Such's gleefully waiting hands. On his
Test match debut on this very ground eight years ago against
England he made 138. Last summer he played marvellously well for
the unbeaten hundred which saved the match against South Africa.
Watching him yesterday was horrible.
Mark Waugh is the most aesthetically pleasing batsman in the land
and is a much-loved cricketer, but he had walked to the wicket
accompanied by a revealing assortment of polite applause,
humiliating cheers and some rude boos. He had returned, seven
scratched runs later, to silence.
That is the trouble with Waugh the younger right now. Not
everyone knows where they are in the debate which rages, least of
all perhaps himself. He is good bloke turned villain and some
would still hang him for his indiscretion. Others are prepared to
forgive. The problem that he has to confront is that no one will
ever forget.
During the lunch interval Dennis Rogers, the chairman of the ACB,
gave a long and frank interview to a fascinated media. He
apologised for what had gone on to Australians at large, but
emphasised that he did not see the cover up by the ACB of the
fines they dished out to Waugh and Shane Warne four years ago as
a cover up at all.
He said that the board dealt with the issue promptly, reported it
to the ICC and felt it needed to go no further. In hindsight, he
admitted, they had got that wrong, though in fairness to Rogers
he was not chairman at the time. Not half they got it wrong. If
you were a Pakistan cricket person right now, you might refer to
the pot and the kettle. There is a great deal of hypocrisy.
Rogers would not say that the ACB would reveal the details of the
incident, in which Waugh and Warne received payment from an
Indian bookmaker, to either the Pakistan Cricket Board or the
judge in Lahore, who is conducting the bribery allegations,
though Rogers may not have a say on that one in time.
However, he did say that an inquiry was needed in Australia in
order to be certain that there were no skeletons left in the
cupboard. He implied that the ICC may have to conduct a worldwide
investigation into this appalling corruption, which is damning
cricket's name.
Basically then, the thing is far from over. Indeed it may have
only just begun, for heaven knows what else lies beneath the
surface. Once a wound such as this is opened, it is not easily
close.
Warne, not here in Adelaide, is best off out of it, away from the
spotlight. Mark Waugh is caught in the most powerful glare. How
dearly he must wish that he had been able to resist temptation.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)