Atherton: Why I am backing Hick to fulfil his great expectations (6 December 1998)
THERE are those cricketers who are loud and brash, easy to know, quick to please and to whom confidence is a fickle friend
06-Dec-1998
6 December 1998
Atherton: Why I am backing Hick to fulfil his great expectations
By Michael Atherton
THERE are those cricketers who are loud and brash, easy to know,
quick to please and to whom confidence is a fickle friend. Others
are quieter, deeper almost, more knowing and yet no matter how
long you play with them you can never say you quite know them.
They carry their hopes and expectations within and rarely exhibit
them for others to see.
Graeme Hick is of the second mould. Not easy to draw out of
himself, problems tend to remain deep inside and confrontation is
rare. I was in the manager's room at Trent Bridge in 1995 when
Ray Illingworth accused him of being soft. He did not say much
before slamming the door on the way out but, far more
importantly, he then went out to score a Test match hundred the
next day.
How nice it would be for him, and indeed for all of us, to go out
to bat in a Test match much as Andrew Flintoff did last year,
without an apparent care in the world. Oh to thrash an early one
through the covers, mishook to the keeper and wander off as if
you were still playing for St Annes in the Northern League.
Yet Graeme has been carrying the burden of other people's
expectations, and his own no doubt, for seven years now. A hope
that he can convert the volume of runs he churns out at New Road
and the manner in which he scores them to the harsher climate of
Test cricket.
The public perception is that so far it has been a Test career
with more downs than ups. Expectation is part of the problem:
scoring so many runs and hundreds before hitting a ball in Test
cricket and being touted so widely as the saviour of English
cricket is a heavy burden for any man to carry at any time.
Especially so for a cricketer and a man from a foreign land
trying to fit into what is his adopted country. Yet Kepler
Wessels showed over the years for Australia that it need not be
an insurmountable problem, and so far Graeme has scored about
3,000 runs for England at an average of 35 - a record comparable
with many players of a more successful reputation.
Indeed for much of the time I was captain Graeme was a key
performer, averaging around 45 between 1993 and 1996. One theory
would be that maybe he too felt he was an essential part of the
plan and that security helped him function more successfully.
Since suffering a bad summer against India and Pakistan in 1996
his selection has been far less secure, and his place always
under threat.
Yet he has had to cope with the brickbats usually reserved for
much lesser players. Performances alone cannot account for some
of the vitriol poured his way. Indeed there was one utterly
disgraceful piece of journalism last year from Michael Calvin.
Unfortunately for him he plays in an era where how you say it is
more important than what you say, or what you do. For he could
not bring himself to lie on the ground, as Darren Gough did on
dropping a catch last week, with his hat over his head, a huge
grin on his face, maniacally waving to the Barmy Army.
In Perth he found himself unexpectedly playing in another Test
match for England, his 50th, when he might instead have been
organising his testimonial back in Worcester. Moreover, having
not played since Bangladesh a month earlier it was not the
easiest situation to find yourself in, Perth being the one wicket
in the world where preparation is essential.
He walked out to bat in the second innings on a pair, and with
his usually safe hands at second slip having previously reprieved
the Australian captain early in his innings. He cut the first
ball he received for four and went on to take the attack to the
Australian bowlers, playing an innings of a cricketer with
character.
Not being an emotive or off-the-cuff kind of player it would be
difficult to envisage this was anything other than a
pre-determined plan of attack. I think he thought that if this
was to be his last Test innings of the tour, and if he was to be
flying back home immediately after the match, then he would damn
well go out there, enjoy it and give it a go.
Now that he is a fully fledged member of the tour party it would
be foolish to abandon that policy. At a moment of need it worked
for him, and it can do so again. More importantly, at this
juncture, it can work.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)