Cricinfo



Cricinfo Daily Newsletter

home


Cricinfo 3D

Audio

Stats

Fantasy

Slogout

Video

Help and Feedback


 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






England v New Zealand
West Indies v Australia
County Cricket 2008
Indian Premier League

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings



The Wisden Cricketer

Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar







ICC could be dragged into row

PCB formally rejects England's compensation claim

Cricinfo staff

October 11, 2006



Inzamam-ul-Haq leads his side back onto the field ... but too late to save the Test © Getty Images
As expected, the Pakistan Cricket Board has formally rejected a request for compensation lodged by their English counterparts following the abandonment of August's Oval Test.

The ECB had asked for around $1.3 million (£800,000) to cover its losses after Pakistan refused to resume playing on the fourth day of the match. The board refunded all fifth-day ticketholders and also gave a 40% reimbursement to the 23,000 in the ground on day of the abandonment.

While talks continue between the boards, there seems little chance of any progress. The PCB maintains that the actions of the umpires were to blame for the resulting refusal by Pakistan to resume the match, and as the employers of the officials, the ICC is responsible for the losses. "We have said in our letter that the Oval Test not being completed is a case of cause and effect," Saleem Altaf, the PCB's director of operations was quoted as saying. "The 'cause' was when umpire Darrell Hair accused our team of ball-tampering and the 'effect' was our team refusing to play the match.

"The ECB should realise that we have been vindicated in our stand on ball-tampering, which led to the effect. They should contact the person responsible for the effect." Altaf's comments did not take into account that Inzamam-ul-Haq was found guilty and punished for bringing the game into disrepute by refusing to play after tea.

If stalemate ensues, then the ECB can ask the ICC to intervene, and the matter is sure to be raised at the board of directors meeting in Mumbai next month.

The ECB would be within its rights to insist on consistency from the ICC. The English authorities had to pay £250,000 to the Zimbabwe board when an ODI in 2004-05 was cancelled because the Zimbabwe authorities refused to allow journalists into the country. It was also hit with a hefty fine when England refused to play in Harare during the 2003 World Cup.

If the ICC decided to pay then there may well be objections from other member countries as ultimately world cricket would be footing the bill for the Pakistan team's actions.

Add to del.icio.us | digg this | Stumble It What's this?

Live scores, results, news, features and more - just a click away
Download the Cricinfo Toolbar
NEW: West Indies v Australia fantasy cricket game
Enter your teams here
Live scores from across the world on your mobile phone
Cricinfo Mobile
Cricinfo home Print this page Email this page to a friend Feedback

Cricket Minute
Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



Stories

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Curtly Ambrose exclusive interview
Video on Cricinfo tv
NEW fantasy: WI v Aus
Enter/login here
Get a taste of the
2008 Wisden Almanack
Listen to news of the day in 60 seconds
Cricket Minute (Podcast)

Sponsored Links
Order the 2008 Wisden & get a free Cricinfo Guide
Special offer at Cricshop
ESPN Soccernet - world's site for the world game
Global football coverage
The latest rugby news & scores at Scrum.com
The perfect pitch for rugby



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories